Divine Command Theory says that an action is right if it has been sanctioned / … One is that we should treat people as an end, and never as a means to an end. With nonconsequentialist (deontological)theories, right and wrong are determined by more than consequences of an action(absolutes). Distinguish between consequentialist and nonconsequentialist ethical theories. There are several variants of non-consequentialist approach such as Divine Command Theory; Natural Rights Theory etc. By this account, censorship of school literature could be justified or not depending on the intent of the censor. Non-Consequentialist Theory Kant’s Categorical Imperative Kant gives several versions of his categorical imperative. Some examples of nonconsequentialist decisions - Volume 17 Issue 1. If the censor is truly… It is sometimes described as duty-, obligation-, or rule-based ethics. A. Non-consequentialist theories accept constraints, options, or both. An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided below. In moral philosophy, deontological ethics or deontology is the normative ethical theory that the morality of an action should be based on whether that action itself is right or wrong under a series of rules, rather than based on the consequences of the action. Constraints are limits or restrictions on what we may do to promote good ends or optimal outcomes—limits on what it is permissible to do, even to achieve noble ends or the greater good. The non-consequentialist approach or deontological approach or the duty ethics focuses on the rightness and wrongness of the actions themselves and not the consequences of those actions. Thus, from a consequentialist standpoint, a morally right act (or omission from acting) is one that will produce a good outcome. The difference is pretty clear between the two, consequentialist ethics cares more on the results of the action and nonconsequentialist ethics cares more of the motive of the action. This is very simplified, but it will do :) The opposite of consequentialism, known as non-consequentialism, argues that the potential consequences of a given action should not be taken into consideration when determining the moral quality of an action. A consequentialist theory - if itsconsequences are good, then the act is right. Consequentialism is a class of normative, teleological ethical theories that holds that the consequences of one's conduct are the ultimate basis for any judgment about the rightness or wrongness of that conduct. But the non-consequentialist would say that there was no moral deed because there was no ethical intention. 2. 1. Deontological ethics is commonly contrasted to consequentialism, virtue ethics, and … For me, the consequentialist ethics makes more sense because it’s worried about the result and the greatest good … Non-consequentialist theories that accept constraints are often referred to as deontological theories. Non-consequentialist ethics holds that actions are intrinsically good or bad (= by themselves), their rightness/wrongness does not depend on their consequences.