If you study Philosophy at university or read around the subject in TOK then you are likely to come across these terms at some point or other. In fact, they are very plainly the direct opposite of each other. The reason empiricism is so much more logical than rationalism as a knowledge base, is because rationalism is too subjective. Rationalism gives too high of an esteem to people’s deductive powers, while tossing out the fundamental scientific evidence touted by empiricism about the science behind knowledge. Rationalism and empiricism are two distinct philosophical approaches to understanding the world around us. Where does knowledge originate? The Difference Locke, Berkeley, and Hume are empiricists (though they have very different views about metaphysics). Rationalism is often contrasted with empiricism. These chicken-or-the-egg questions are central to epistemology, or the study of knowledge. Furthermore, these questions are … Rationalism vs Empiricism. The two terms, rationalism and empiricism, are markers of the great fundamental divide between two rather dominant theories of knowledge. Although this is an overly simple generalisation, there are essentially two major schools of thought or theories about how we know things. Rationalism is the belief in innate ideas, reason, and deduction. Empiricism is the philosophy that knowledge can only be discovered by observation and measurement. Taken very broadly, these views are not mutually exclusive, since a philosopher can be both rationalist and empiricist. Rationalism is the viewpoint that knowledge mostly comes from intellectual reasoning, and empiricism is the viewpoint that knowledge mostly comes from using your senses to observe the world. Rationalism and Empiricism Some Notes on Epistemological Strategies and their Implications in Ethics While the main focus in an ethics course is on ethics and the problems and issues that ethics raises, it is impossible to investigate these problems in isolation, without at least some excursions into the other philosophical sub-disciplines. Rationalism vs. Empiricism First published Thu Aug 19, 2004; substantive revision Thu Mar 21, 2013 The dispute between rationalism and empiricism concerns the extent to which we are dependent upon sense experience in our effort to gain knowledge. Rationalism is the philosophy that knowledge can be discovered by thinking. By Jay Stooksberry. Rationalism vs Empiricism posted by John Spacey, January 25, 2020. Empiricism v. rationalism . THE EMPIRICISTS: Empiricists share the view that there is no such thing as innate knowledge, and that instead knowledge is derived from experience (either sensed via the five senses or reasoned via the brain or mind). Is it a naturally gifted to humanity or is it constructed process built on experience? Posted by beckyclay | November 22, 2006. Rationalism vs. Empiricism . There is a distinct difference between rationalism and empiricism. Rationalism vs. Empiricism, Why Descartes is a Rationalist. While for the rationalists, reason is the primary basis of knowledge, the empiricists consider experience as the source of all knowledge.