40 0 obj <> endobj %PDF-1.6 %���� The evaluation approach, design and methodologies should match the specific project. �P@Gũ@�PDϔt$��2�C#���)/��� 1999. Figure 7.1 Format of the Logic Model Example Used in the PEPH Evaluation Metrics Manual. 0000000997 00000 n PROJECT EVALUATION Multi-Criteria Analysis 5) Refine the Analysis a) New Statement of Needs b) New or Modified Alternatives c) Additional Analysis d) New Criteria for Ranking the Options Strategy >> Program >>Project Market Demand Analysis a b d c Figure by MIT OCW. Evaluation draws on the data and information generated by the monitoring system as a way of analyzing the trends in effects and impact of the project. Eval Program Plann 22(1). :�.��S����dz���QB�.���*�y'J�,P|(_(��w�D_�osȹ�b����iy)����Y�� �� M>M�8�KY�z�D��7�S�z�)GDMg�U!ѡO�!��8�5�DV�b��I� (2004) Beginner. impacts, and we provide examples of how these elements may be useful for project planning and evaluation. %%EOF There are a variety of evaluation designs, and the type of evaluation should match the development level of the program or program activity appropriately. Watson S. 2002. 40. 0000000016 00000 n A formative evaluation tends to be more focused on learning and management than accountability. 270 0 obj <>stream This is a guiding framework for the evaluation team members (be they organizational members, external evaluators,or a mix) to make sure that all important 0 startxref 0000003439 00000 n Evaluation Types When to use What it shows Why it is useful 0 0000000556 00000 n %PDF-1.6 %���� h��Xko9�+�ب���C�"%�I�&mT�m���&�x �����6`B�jV��_����_[j�8��0!r˔��S� �L��V2i8�&�q(H&u1��0��L impacts, and we provide examples of how these elements may be useful for project planning and evaluation. The purpose of a formative evaluation is to help shape the future of the project or programme concerned, and thereby improve performance. �H��ڥ�vz����km�Xu���p7w���\����t �C�N�������L�V�C���6�� �]]B�[�A�e��ܺ. 1999. 68. McLaughlin JA, Jordan GB. Logic Models: A tool for telling your program’s performance story. However, special attention has been given to aligning the Handbook to NSF’s unique needs and experiences. evaluation, which often measures the results of a project’s implementation against its programmatic projections, there are not necessarily a priori assumptions about what the planning process will look like. 0000005368 00000 n xref ����.v z'�~>8z�Y�_���������@4_�*��Q�D�� S+l��[d5�)0�.is\�Qr ����Blh�m���x�U������e�#$j��c ��K댭�^eڷ ua>��V"�F� �Il��R���J�8�9�B`B�\� ����5�T�›޿���Nǃ�3�v[�-�ܟ0+�� 3�}Ӂ4�S �U�K�ˇ��Sqן�S8go|[ғɠ����Fh�/��|�-:e��ɢI�Xx��-C�zF[������O[��ap���L�. 0000000806 00000 n A formative evaluation is normally carried out during a project or programme, often at the mid-point. Watson S. 2002. !b�Q=1-3����+��R��j��,e-[S�u�+�I���Vgһ�r�+����IN^b�r����#�e�J��fkuw��&��*K.ށ� ��nN�gǚMm��,A�j�@�AQ�. Handbook for Project Evaluation ) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. the difference between evaluation types. 213 0 obj <> endobj PROJECT EVALUATION Multi-Criteria Analysis 8) Reconsider Strategies, Programs, Projects, and Needs - Easier Approvals for Similar Projects - Higher Construction Standards - Consider Broader Needs (e.g. Designing Evaluation for Education Projects (.pdf), NOAA Office of Education and Sustainable Development. Project evaluation refers to the systematic investigation of an object’s worth or merit. Bš���� �%`T�1�f� i VG~?�=�6���)�� WY�qL�w�=`��u`a�>��{j�j��MZk6�AYZ@���< ��"�fZ��M~��"� KQ�l�e��L�w��,����"�� �Ylu�PU����&�CD� ��� Figure 7.1 Format of the Logic Model Example Used in the PEPH Evaluation Metrics Manual. The methodology is applied in projects, programs and policies. McLaughlin JA, Jordan GB. Identifying the Need for a Project b7�)�C��4�2���{H��2�&6���Z�wH�mrGr#�^t�� ��5���������8�n%�+� R���4{3�ig{�R�5�����VJ�,�Jբ��}�E�:��Hk��^�}qC�ő����5���)�v��B�J#M��T�B�G�WmT���f����D� �I���-i��(���/����%2���Z��\w�_��y�|?L� 69. %%EOF H��V�r�F��+��(;_\��؎�He1�A����`�1 �3��y=�VlQU\0�����_�}h�G7�ы�, �f�QJ^)~�NJ|7�Y5z�Z'�k��#��#����G����l2����R6u��Q��M�8����s��������y�������_��{��3z����a�e��I����Q6E�q��޺7��Sk��hwt#�����}3��w��4r3g2��СO*_�R�U/'$���1Q�R�G�>�OBw��!�>� 0000001118 00000 n Project evaluation is a systematic and objective assessment of an ongoing or completed project.1The aim is to determine the relevance and level of achievement of project objectives, development effectiveness, efficiency, impact and sustainability. Project Evaluation Methodologies : An Overview • Hierarchy of evaluation techniques • Ideally, a complete economic evaluation aims to clarify, quantify and value all the relevant options, their inputs and consequences • Ambitious; the gold‐standard • Cost‐Benefit Analysis (CBA) • … endstream endobj 214 0 obj <> endobj 215 0 obj <> endobj 216 0 obj <>stream Project evaluation has three main purposes:  To assess whether project objectives have been achieved – especially the outcomes for individuals, groups or communities  To find out how and why things have worked (or not)  To provide insights and information for learning and development <]>> “Evaluation questions” will be explained as the first step in making a work plan, and then, “basis for judgment,” “necessary data and data sources,” and “data collection methods” will follow. Evaluation A periodic, systematic assessment of a project’s relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, and impact on a defined population. All the impacts associated with a capital project are identified and, where possible, costs and benefits valued in monetary terms, so that the projects 4. (`N��|ȇEv}���q�z.Zk�(tcs��e�>�0��A��9�McjI�dt7(XM��Yÿ��o��i�ԁ0�O��4�����l�!�l�������d4�/����g�������q���I��p( HY%��*�8�?������pL�ikpA8����1iaS����,�K H���L,;�HjS13@�� �)�槰*:�-�i=��z1.�ʚ����ii����Vt�0�J��`@�c\F���6"���8b���ƍ�Ua}��2h�XK} �7u�n�s��}��6�_�?�������b-�; &� �\� L6t��~�Vv�n�R�]B����+5n���I��tY�׸��x#����:��̡X ~�� Project evaluation can be defined as the process of gathering information to assess the effects and impact of a project. 52 0 obj<>stream It defines evaluation, and explains why it is important and challenging, with quotes about the evaluation experiences of several environmental educators. 0000002146 00000 n endstream endobj 41 0 obj<> endobj 42 0 obj<> endobj 43 0 obj<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/ExtGState<>>> endobj 44 0 obj<> endobj 45 0 obj<> endobj 46 0 obj[/ICCBased 51 0 R] endobj 47 0 obj<> endobj 48 0 obj<> endobj 49 0 obj<> endobj 50 0 obj<>stream